Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Federica Urgesi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs F. Urgesi

Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
FRA
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
20
-
Height
-
126
C. Rank
402
122
Best Rank
379
1
Total Titles
0
1
YTD Titles
0
$40.5K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Federica Urgesi
ITA
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
20
-
Height
-
126
C. Rank
402
122
Best Rank
379
1
Total Titles
0
1
YTD Titles
0
$40.5K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Rajaonah 1 - 0 Urgesi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah winning 2 and Federica Urgesi winning 1. The last match between Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah and Federica Urgesi was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rajaonah | 1 |
| Urgesi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Manchester(02-18-25)
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
6
2
6
Federica Urgesi
2
6
3
T. R. Rajaonah vs F. Urgesi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $40,460 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.73% (121-75) | Career Total W/L | 50.62% (82-80) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 66.67% (8-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
T. R. Rajaonah vs F. Urgesi Match Preview:
- Inconsistency in second serve: In the past six months, Urgesi and Rajaonah showcased a slight difference in their performance when serving their second serve. Urgesi managed to win 44.86% of points, while Rajaonah achieved a slightly higher success rate of 45.94%. Notably, this statistic correlates significantly with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game prowess: Examining recent return game statistics, Urgesi has proven to be particularly formidable. During this period, Urgesi successfully secured 55.96% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Rajaonah displayed commendable form, winning 52.77% of such points. Evaluating first serve returns, Urgesi achieved a success rate of 40.62%, while Rajaonah performed slightly better at 42.14%. These return game statistics hold considerable weight in determining the favorable player in their head-to-head matchup.
- Grace under pressure: When facing crucial moments, Urgesi exhibited composure by saving 54.22% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Rajaonah showcased an even higher ability to withstand pressure, saving 57.87% of breakpoints. This invaluable statistic serves as a useful tool for making predictions during in-game betting.
- Performance analysis: Over the past year, Urgesi emerged victorious in 59.02% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 36/25. Similarly, Rajaonah achieved a slightly higher success rate, winning 59.38% of matches with a record of 38/26. Considering their head-to-head encounters, these figures provide valuable insights for predicting the overall outcome.
- Mastery of different surfaces: Each player has distinct levels of proficiency on different court surfaces. Urgesi dominates on I.hard courts with an impressive win percentage of 67% (W/L 10/5), while their performance on Hard courts faltered with a lower win percentage of 43% (W/L 3/4). In contrast, Rajaonah excels on Clay courts, achieving a remarkable win percentage of 67% (W/L 74/36). However, Rajaonah struggles on I.hard courts, attaining a win percentage of only 38% (W/L 6/10).
- Player level and competition: In the previous year, Urgesi predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10,000. Remarkably, Urgesi triumphed in 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/20) within this sphere. Similarly, Rajaonah frequently participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments with the same prize range, securing victory in 56% of matches (W/L 28/22). It is important to consider these contextual factors when comparing statistics to predict a favorite, as results are contingent upon the level of the events they have competed in.
- Opponent quality: In the last 12 months, Urgesi encountered opponents with an average rank of 441.56, while Rajaonah faced players with an average rank of 421.05. These statistics shed light on the caliber of opposition each player has encountered, which would influence their respective performances.
- Deciding set prowess: For those captivated by the excitement of live predictions and betting, it is crucial to consider the players' track record in deciding sets. In the past year, Urgesi emerged victorious in 56% of such sets, showcasing admirable resilience. On the other hand, Rajaonah attained a success rate of 48% in all matches played on tour. These statistics play a pivotal role in forecasting the outcome when the match hangs on a knife's edge.
- Current event statistics: Historical player performance proves invaluable when predicting tennis matches. However, once an event commences, it becomes essential to examine the players' current event statistics. This allows us to gauge their current form and momentum. You can find the most up-to-date information in the section below, particularly if either player has already played a match in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is important to consider that certain players may thrive in specific events, and this aspect must be considered when forecasting the final result.
- Breakpoint conversion: Presently, Urgesi exhibits impressive breakpoint conversion, successfully capitalizing on 45.28% of the opportunities presented. Rajaonah follows closely, converting 47.59% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics provide crucial insights for in-game live betting, especially when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have a keen interest in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is worth highlighting that this resource caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Federica Urgesi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. R. Rajaonah vs F. Urgesi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:37:46 | Average Match Time | 0:37:46 |
| 65% (49/75) | 1st Serve % | 61% (53/87) |
| 65% (32/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (34/53) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (13/34) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 46% (40/87) | Return Points Win % | 43% (32/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Rajaonah 44%, Urgesi 42%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Rajaonah 58%, Urgesi 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Rajaonah 54%, Urgesi 52%.
T. R. Rajaonah Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 1-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-5 ret. | ||
F. Urgesi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||

T. R. Rajaonah vs F. Urgesi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.73% (121/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.62% (82/80) |
| 58.37% (265/189) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.13% (194/193) |
| 53.73% (2262/1948) | Games Win/Loss | 50.64% (1869/1822) |
| 50.00% (16/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 65.94% (91/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.86% (56/61) |
| 53.85% (14/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.53% (23/15) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 203 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 767 | Total Double Faults | 519 |
| 1:33:43 | Average Match Time | 1:43:21 |
| 379.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.43 |
| 65% (8064/12437) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6674/10490) |
| 60% (4866/8064) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3949/6674) |
| 44% (1917/4373) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1648/3816) |
| 49% (847/1713) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (661/1376) |
| 48% (6025/12575) | Return Points Win % | 47% (4985/10613) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 73.33% (11/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 54.10% (66/56) | Challenger W/L | 49.22% (63/65) |
| 78.57% (44/12) | Futures W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 61% (119/194) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (81/160) |
| 53% (25/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (13/31) |
| 61% (39/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (34/65) |
| 91% (108/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (84/67) |
| 9% (108/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (84/17) |
| 26% (88/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (78/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:40 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:35 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
08:35
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal